|
Every writer, copy-editor and proofreader comes across words that are used correctly but spelled incorrectly (typos), but we also have to look out for words that are spelled correctly but used incorrectly – this is the world of confusables.
What are confusables?
Some confusables are not only spelled differently, they sound very different too, e.g. imply/infer; militate/mitigate; reactionary/reactive. In this case, the writer might have misunderstood the meaning.
Some confusables are homophones – words that are spelled differently but sound the same, e.g. rein/reign; stationary/stationery; prophecy/prophesy; loath/loathe. In this case, the writer understands the different meanings, but is unsure of the appropriate spelling. Then there are errors that are simply a result of hands moving too fast over a keyboard – the meanings and correct spellings are known to the writer, but, in their haste, perhaps they’ve transposed a couple of letters or omitted a character. Or it may be that the automatic spellcheck has kicked into gear and the writer hasn’t noticed the problem because they’re concentrating on the bigger picture. Examples might include e.g. filed/field; adverse/averse; pubic/public. Blind spots
Writers aren't the only ones with blind spots. Editorial pros do too. It’s our job to spot these problems and fix them.
However, we’re only human and most of us have a few blind-spot words that our eyes are, on occasion, less likely to notice, even though we do know the differences in meaning and spelling. My own blind spots are gaffe/gaff, brake/break and peek/pique/peak. I don’t know why my eye doesn’t spot these pesky confusables as readily, especially when the likes of compliment/complement or stationary/stationery scream at me from the page! However, I accept that I do have blind spots and have taken steps to ameliorate the problem with a little mechanical help – the macro. How can macros help?
Using macros enables us to identify possible problems before we get down to the business of actually reading, line by line, for sense.
Every time we find an error, we have to think about it and decide whether to amend. By reducing the number of interruptions, we can focus our attention on the flow of the words in front of us and increase efficiency. For this reason, I, like many of my colleagues, run my macros at the beginning of a project (though I often repeat the process at the end stage too). My preferred tool
CompareWordList is currently my preferred tool simply because of how easy it is to create and update my own list of words to be checked – words that can, on occasion, be blind spots for me.
As I’ll show below, customizing the list of confusables doesn’t require me to amend the script of the macro once it’s installed. Instead, all I have to do is amend a basic list in a Word document – nice and simple! 1. Create your list of confusables
The first thing to do is to create a list of the words you want the macro to find, and highlight, in a Word document.
For speed, and so you can see the basic format of the list, you can download a copy of a list here. If you want to rename it, do so. Then add words, or remove them, as you see fit. 2. Get, and tweak, the code
Visit “Highlight Words from a List” and copy the code. If you’re completely new to installing macros, just paste the script in a Word document for now so that you can tweak it easily.
Below is a screenshot of Wyatt's code. The highlighted sections show where I’ve tweaked the code to suit my own needs. Tweaks to consider (1) I’ve changed Wyatt's code (as per his suggestion) so that it describes where my list of confusables is located: sCheckDoc = "c:\Users\Louise\Dropbox\Macros\confusables.docx". You’ll use the location you made a note of when you created your own list (see the section above – Using CompareWordList 1: Create your list of confusables). (2) Wyatt's code emboldens the words found by the macro; I wanted them highlighted so I replaced the highlighted text as follows: .Replacement.Highlight = True. (3) I changed the Match Whole Word instruction to False because I wanted the macro to find part words. This, of course, will pull up some false positives but it was the easiest solution I could find. (4) I also changed the Match Case instruction to False. Now that you’ve tweaked the code to suit your own needs, you’re ready to install it (the basic, step-by-step instructions below are provided for the benefit of those who are completely new to macro installation). 3. Install the code
With Word open, open the “View” tab and click on the “Macros” icon on the ribbon.
This will open up a new window.
If you don’t have any macros already loaded:
If you have macros loaded (your TEST macro or any other):
This will open up a further window:
The installation is now complete. Running CompareWordList
Removing highlights one by one
Here’s a tiny macro that I recorded to remove a highlight as I move through a Word document. Installing this means I simply have to click on a highlighted word and run the macro.
Assigning a shortcut button (see below) makes the job easy and efficient. I decided on Alt H because I don’t have that keyboard shortcut assigned to any function that I carry out regularly. Sub UndoHighlight()
To install: Simply copy the red script above and install it in the same way that you installed the CompareWordList macro.
To create a shortcut key: In Word, select File, Options, Customize Ribbon (1). Click on Customize (2). A new box will open up entitled “Customize keyboard”. In the Categories window (3), scroll down and select Macros. In the Macros window (4), select UndoHighlight. Finally, choose your preferred keyboard combination by typing it into the Press New Shortcut Key window (5). Select Assign and Close.
To remove ALL highlighting in one go: For this job, Paul Beverley’s your man. A huge number of macros are available via his website: Word Macro Tools.
Hope you find this useful! About Louise Harnby
Louise Harnby is a line editor, copyeditor and proofreader who specializes in working with crime, mystery, suspense and thriller writers.
She is an Advanced Professional Member of the Chartered Institute of Editing and Proofreading (CIEP) and co-hosts The Editing Podcast.
11 Comments
24/1/2016 11:16:45 am
Excellent article, Louise, and a good solution to a problem. Alas, as you already suspect, I do have some comments. :)
Reply
25/1/2016 09:00:28 am
Fantastic - thanks Louise.
Reply
KL Cooper
13/3/2017 06:18:39 pm
Please change the font on your website. I can barely read it. It strains my eyes. And this should definitely NOT be the case for website/blog that talks about proofreading!
Reply
Louise Harnby
13/3/2017 10:30:05 pm
Is it the colour or the actual font that's straining your eyes, KL? Once I know, I'll survey other readers too.
Reply
24/3/2017 12:38:17 pm
Thank you, dear Louise, for sharing yet another great tool with your readers!
Reply
Louise Harnby
24/3/2017 01:13:42 pm
Hi Rosanna! Thanks for your feedback. I think it depends on the device. The grey is clear to me! However, I want to be readable for as many people as possible so I'll play around with the grey and see if I can deepen it. The background, on the blog anyway, is unchangeable, but I can certainly play around with the sections on the other pages. As for the font, that's trickier. I'd be happy to settle for Arial, but I'm not going to introduce a serif font. I haven't used that for years. I'll have a tinker and see how things look. Difficult to get it right so that everyone likes it, especially given the number of visitors! Really appreciate your taking the time to make me think about it, though!
Reply
27/6/2019 11:51:48 pm
Great macro!!
Reply
Louise Harnby
28/6/2019 12:41:53 pm
Yup, it's not perfect! I'd use PerfectIt for the in to/into flagging.
Reply
15/12/2022 07:46:47 pm
If you want to check both at the same time, you can do this with wildcards. Either of these two strings should work:: 18/11/2022 07:47:59 pm
What a great tool! Thank you for sharing.
Reply
Faron N Fowler
2/6/2023 11:44:58 pm
Was wondering if there is an easy way to have the macro highlight phrases. Each word in the CompareList is on it's own line, so can we add a multi-word expression rather than a singular word and make this word? For example, if I had the expression 'At the end of the day', could we tweak the macro to highlight that without highlighting every occurrence of 'at', the', 'of', and 'day'?
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
BLOG ALERTS
Sign up for blog alerts!
NEWSLETTER
Sign up for The Editorial Letter.
EDITOR RESOURCES
BOOKS FOR EDITORS AND WRITERS
TRAINING COURSES FOR EDITORS
TESTIMONIALS
'I love the clean impact you've brought to my writing'
Thomas R Weaver 'The voyage through your edits is an intellectual and craft adventure' Dan Flanigan 'I'm a better writer because you edited my book' Rich Leder 'You are by far the best literary editor I've had' Nina Fitzpatrick 'I wholeheartedly recommend her services ... Just don’t hire her when I need her' Jeff Carson 'Sincere thanks for a beautiful and elegant piece of work. First class' JB Turner CATEGORIES
All
ARCHIVES
April 2026
|
|
|