With the growing number of computer tools available for proofreaders and editors, we can all work faster and therefore improve our earning capacity – and we can do a better job for our clients by producing more consistent texts.
But where and how can we learn the new techniques that are needed to make best use of the available tools? In my day-to-day work, I use dozens of macros, so for what it’s worth, maybe I can share my experience.
The thing I feel is that I’m not just using a larger number of macros, but have developed different types of macros – as a result, some of my ways of working have changed a fair bit.
Recently, I’ve been trying to “watch” myself working and analyse what I’m doing that might be different from someone who only uses very basic macros. Here are a few random thoughts.
Which tools do you use to improve consistency and introduce efficiencies?
About Paul Beverley
Paul has over 25 years’ experience as a technical author, publisher, proofreader and editor, and has the highest available editing qualification: LCGI (editing skills). Paul is passionate about macros and has used his programming ability to complement his writing and editing skills. Through his series of Macro Chat posts, he aims to share his knowledge and open up a dialogue about the benefits of macros to anyone working with words. Comments and questions are always welcome so please do join the discussion. No question is too basic!
Visit his business website at Archive Publications, and access his free book at Macros for Writers and Editors.
Promoting an editorial business has never been easier – and it’s never been harder. The internet provides us with access to a global marketplace; that means each of us is discoverable to a much greater number of clients.
The internet also provides our clients with access to a global supply base; that means each of us has a greater number of competitors. So how do you stand out in a world where anyone can say they’re a proofreader, editor, indexer, or copywriter? How do you persuade your potential client that it would be worth their while to contact you and ask you for a quotation?
The issue is one of instilling trust. It’s about persuading the client – making them really believe – that you are who you say you are, and that you can do what you say you can do.
Trust versus truth
Trust and truth aren’t the same thing. Truth is defined by Oxford as ‘That which is true or in accordance with fact or reality.’ Trust is belief in that reality. Without evidence, potential clients can’t know the truth of the phrase ‘I am a professional proofreader’. The best that I can hope for is that they believe it to be the truth – that they trust it to be the truth.
Instilling trust is therefore key when we are creating our marketing messages, whether online or in print. Potential clients, who will often be complete strangers to us, are more likely to get in contact if they believe the content of our websites, brochures, and résumés.
The 4 Ps to instil belief
There are tools we can use to persuade our potential clients that we are worthy of their trust – these tools are the 4 Ps: pictures, praise, portfolios, and professional practice.
P1: Pictures (smiley ones!)
It’s not uncommon for the new entrant to the field of editorial freelancing field to be horrified by the idea of including a mugshot of themselves on their website, brochure, or résumé. ‘I’m not photogenic’; ‘I don’t have any nice photos of myself’; ‘I hate having my picture taken!’
So you’re shy! Me too. Maybe you don’t have the kind of face that will have Vogue clamoring to put you on its front cover. Me neither. Do it anyway. Your client isn’t trying to hire a new sociable best friend, nor do they need a supermodel; what your client needs is a proofreader (or editor/indexer/copywriter).
They don’t just want any old proofreader, though. They want someone then can trust when they hand over the manuscript they sweated over. They want a real individual, not some anonymous person they’ve never met working for a huge, faceless corporate agency whose website, while attractive, looks somewhat impersonal.
‘I’ve wept over this novel, literally torn hairs from my scalp as I tackled draft after draft. I needed to feel that the person I was hiring gave a damn and would treat me and my book in a way that respected that,’ said one self-publishing novelist who contacted me for a proofreading quotation some time back.
One key word from the above quote is ‘person.’ She wanted to hire a person, not an agency, not a machine. The other key words are ‘gave a damn.’ She wanted to feel that the person she hired would care.
Providing evidence that you are a real person, one who is prepared (for a fee) to invest professional commitment (care) in your client’s project, is difficult when you don’t have a face. If you don’t include a picture of your face on your website, for example, all you have is words.
Even if they’re great words, they won’t show your smile. Smiles are powerful – when you smile at people, you make them feel good. ‘Genuine smiles (the ones that involve the muscles surrounding the eyes) induce positive feelings among those who are smiled at’ (‘Want to Increase Trust in Others? Just Smile,’ G. Greengross, Psychology Today, 2015).
And Samuele Centorrino et al. published a study early in 2015 suggesting ‘that smiles perceived as honest serve as a signal that has evolved to induce cooperation in situations requiring mutual trust’ (‘Honest signaling in trust interactions: smiles rated as genuine induce trust and signal higher earning opportunities,’ S. Centorrino et al., Emotion & Human Behavior, 2015).
In other words, smiles create belief. So when you complement the great words on your website with a picture of your smiling face, you appear more trustworthy to your client. Compare that with the impact your faceless competitor is making, and then get out your camera.
If you feel embarrassed by the idea of asking satisfied clients to write a few words in praise of the work you’ve done for them, consider the following points that I address in Chapter 24 of Marketing Your Editing & Proofreading Business:
Social proof builds trust – again, we’re talking about providing evidence that enables a potential client to believe that you can deliver on your promises. Testimonials from third parties provide social proof because ‘people tend to believe what other people believe, especially people they respect. So if you can assemble a group of people, especially opinion leaders, who rave about you, you build credibility … that’s how we humans work’ (A. Neitlich, ‘The Importance of Testimonials,’ Sitepoint, 2004).
The third piece of evidence that helps our clients to believe what we are saying is found in the portfolio. I’ve already written a 1,500-word article about the power of the portfolio, which you can read here: The Power of the Portfolio.
In summary, I argue that the portfolio instills trust because it shows the potential client not just what I say I can do, but also what I have already done. As I contend in The Power of the Portfolio, ‘Anyone can set up an editorial business and write (or hire someone else to write) great copy that tells the customer what they want to hear. The portfolio takes things a step further, anchoring the message in a have-donepractice-based, rather than could-do promise-based, framework.’
Your portfolio shows your client that you have already practiced what you preach. It builds confidence in your client’s vision of you as a supplier who can deliver on his or her promises. That’s a powerful emotion to induce in a client because you’ve already placed your professionalism ahead of money in the client’s mind before they’ve even contacted you.
P4: Professional practice
Finally, summarize those key points that reflect your professionalism – these are the things that show that proofreading or editing isn’t a hobby. Rather, you are a skilled professional who has relevant training and qualifications that make you fit for purpose and deserving of the fees you charge for what you bring to the table.
Finally, think, too, about what your target client groups want. Marketing materials aimed at publishers might focus on attributes that an independent fiction author isn’t interested in; for example, ability to use industry-recognized proof-correction markup language.
And academic clients looking to publish in scholarly journals may be more trusting of an editor who claims she knows how to work with particular styles of referencing and citation.
Successful marketing isn’t about truth, but about trust – telling the truth is important (though that’s beyond the scope of this article), but a nervous client who’s never worked with you before can’t possibly know whether your claims are truthful. Rather, we need to do things that will help our clients believe that our claims have truth to them.
Pictures, praise, portfolios, and summaries of professional practice are four tools that will help build this belief.
A version of this article was first published on An American Editor.
Louise Harnby is a professional proofreader, the curator of The Proofreader's Parlour, and the author of Business Planning for Editorial Freelancers and Marketing Your Editing & Proofreading Business. She is an Advanced Professional Member of the Society for Editors and Proofreaders (SfEP). Visit her business website at Louise Harnby | Proofreader, follow her on Twitter at @LouiseHarnby, or find her on LinkedIn.
SEARCH THE BLOG
Books for writers and editors
Online courses for editors and proofreaders
'Louise uses her expertise to hone a story until it's razor sharp, while still allowing the author’s voice to remain dominant.'
'I wholeheartedly recommend her services ... Just don’t hire her when I need her.'
J B Turner
'Sincere thanks for a beautiful and elegant piece of work. First class.'
'What makes her stand out and shine is her ability to immerse herself in your story.'
Help for editors
All text on this blog, The Parlour, and on the other pages of this website (unless indicated otherwise) is in copyright © 2011–20 Louise Harnby. Please do not copy or reproduce any of the content, in whole or part, in any form, unless you ask first.